Patrick wrote:The Maris plot in The Ann Who Came To Dinner :
Instead of putting the anklet in the crate containing the painting and provoking that dramatic pursuit by the police, why not simply quietly leave the anklet at home where she was expected to be and it would have been days before they discovered that she had left?
In truth, the second that bracelet was removed from her the monitoring center would have gotten a "tamper" alert. They may not have checked on her before she was able to flee but they would have known she removed the bracelet. Those bracelets are such that they have to remain in contact with the skin in order for them to work propertly. Also, if she was on a GPS style monitoring bracelet, those have to be plugged in on a daily basis in order to remain charged. They stop working and again, an alert is generated. And, the "old school" GPS monitors required the person to carry a tracking system with them. It was not a small thing either and the GPS would not work without it.
If she was simply on regular Electronic Monitoring, those systems don't track where you are at any given moment. They only show if you are "in range" our "out of range" of the monitoring box which is usually placed in your residence. The bracelet in that case isn't what is being tracked, it's the signal the bracelet gives to the monitoring box which is hooked up through your phone.
Electronic monitoring and GPS of offenders is a huge part of my job and whenever I see ridiculous stuff regarding monitoring on TV shows it tends to drive me nuts!